WR Medical Electronics Co WR Medical Electronics Co
WR Medical Electronics Co
WR Medical Electronics Co Neurophysiology Products from WR Medical TherabathPRO Paraffin Bath About WR Medical Electronics Co Contact WR Medical Electronics Co Search site WR Medical Electronics Co
WR Medical Electronics Co WR Medical Electronics Co
 

Selected References for the Hilger, Silverstein, and Brackmann II

Contents

To obtain a copy of the article, please contact the publisher or the author.


HILGER ARTICLES

A Simple Prognostic Test in Facial Palsy
E.D.R. Campbell, D.Phys.Med.
Journal of Laryngology 77: 462-66, June, 1963.
ABSTRACT: Nerve-excitability tests are easy to perform, need relatively simple equipment and give 85-90 percent accuracy in the prognosis of facial palsies. The results show how poor a recovery may be expected when complete nerve degeneration occurs and some arguments are presented in support of immediate decompression.

Global MST: Predicting Prognosis for Bell's Palsy and Ramsay Hunt Syndrome Patients
Kedar K. Adour, MD
Paper presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, September, 1994. Send reprint requests to Kedar K. Adour, MD, Dept. of Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W. MacArthur Blvd., Oakland, CA 94611-5693.
ABSTRACT: Global MST (Maximal Stimulation Test) using the Hilger Facial Nerve Stimulator is an accurate, well-tolerated, easy-to-perform, cost-effective method of predicting prognosis in patients with acute facial palsy.

Hilger Facial Nerve Stimulator: A 25-Year Update
Brent I. Lewis, MD; Kedar K. Adour, MD; Jonathan M. Kahn, MD; Alison J. Lewis, MD
Laryngoscope 101:January, 1991, 71-74. Send reprint requests to Kedar K. Adour, MD, Dept. of Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W. MacArthur Blvd., Oakland, CA 94611-5693.
ABSTRACT: Percutaneous nerve excitability testing using the Hilger facial nerve stimulator was introduced about 25 years ago. The test is reliable, easy to use, and inexpensive; it continues to be the most frequently used method for predicting prognosis of facial nerve disorders. Between 1966 and 1974, we recorded 10,243 nerve excitability tests on 865 patients with a mean of 3.29 tests for each peripheral branch and 3.43 for the trunk. Using a multiple regression model, we determined the effect on nerve stimulation values of age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, partial or complete clinical paralysis, diagnosis of herpes zoster, year of testing, and eventual facial paralysis recovery profile. We discuss statistical reliability, provide a table of interpretive results, and offer "tips and traps" invaluable to the practitioner. A prospective study of 25 patients with residual facial paralysis was evaluated by two separate otolaryngologists to determine intertester reliability.

Maximum Stimulation Test (MST)
M. May
Excerpted from The Facial Nerve, New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1986.
ABSTRACT: The maximum stimulation test is an excellent way of evaluating facial nerve degeneration soon after onset. The test can be performed with any stimulator for which the strength and duration of the stimulus can be varied. The test involves observing the muscle's response to an electrical stimulus. Therefore, the patient must be cooperative so that he does not flinch or pull away. The author suggests reassuring the patient, in some cases sedation, and decreasing the skin resistance to help diminish discomfort. First, the skin is prepared. After the probe is applied to the skin, the current is slowly increased from 1.0 milliamperes (mA) to 5.0 mA. The major branches of the motor portion of the extracranial facial nerve are sampled: 1) forehead and eyebrow, 2) preorbital area, 3) cheek, upper lip, and nasal ala, 4) lower lip, 5) cervical and platysma area. In addition, the area of the stylomastoid foramen is tested, which samples the entire nerve rather than each branch. When interpreting the results, the amount of muscle twitch in response to a stimulation on the affected side is compared to that of the normal side. The observations are useful in predicting the outcome in patients with traumatic facial paralysis.

The Maximal Stimulation and Facial Nerve Conduction Latency Tests: Predicting the Outcome of Bell's Palsy
John M. Ruboyianes, MD; Kedar K. Adour, MD; David W. Santos, MD; Peter G. Von Doersten, MD
Laryngoscope 104: January, 1994, 1-6. Send reprint requests to John M. Ruboyianes, MD, North Campbell ENT, 3982 North Campbell, Tucson, AZ 85719.
ABSTRACT: To test the hypothesis that the facial nerve conduction latency test is a better and earlier indicator of prognosis than other electrodiagnostic tests, 86 patients with Bell's palsy were followed for a minimum of 4 months. To select control subjects for our own research clinic and for comparison with the patient population, latency values in 25 normal volunteers (50 sides) were determined. Serial maximal stimulation tests (MST) and latency tests were conducted to determine disease severity and prognosis in Bell's palsy patients. Outcome was graded using the Facial Paralysis Recovery Profile (FPRP) and Facial Paralysis Recovery Index (FRPI) as well as the House grading system. The capability of the two tests to accurately predict outcome was evaluated. The MST accurately predicted outcome in 94 percent of patients studied. In the control group, normal latency values were a mean 3.8 msec with a standard deviation of 0.49. In the patient population, latency values were either within normal limits or absent. When done within 4 days of the onset of Bell's palsy, neither test was capable of predicting axonal degeneration. Statistical analyses included Fisher's Exact Test, the paired Student's t test, and correlation coefficient calculations.

Nerve Excitability Testing: Technical Pitfalls and Threshold Norms Using Absolute Values
George A. Gates, MD
Laryngoscope 103: April, 1993, 379-85. Send reprint requests to George A. Gates, MD, 517 S. Euclid, Box 8115, St. Louis, MO 63110.
ABSTRACT: Percutaneous stimulation of the facial nerve is used widely in tests to judge the severity and prognosis of facial paralysis. Several test paradigms are used, including nerve excitability threshold (NET), the maximum stimulation test (MST), and electroneurography (EnoG). Consistent technique and careful control of variables are essential to achieve accurate test results. The sources of variability examined in this study were age, gender, body weight, and the use of electrode paste; the NET was used as the test method. The facial NET in 120 adults without a history of facial paralysis increased linearly with age (P = .0004) and with body weight (P<.0001) and was higher in men than in women adjusted for age and weight (P = .0001). The mean NET ± SD was 0.7 ± 0.27 mA in the upper division using the eyelid twitch as an end point, and 1.2 ± 0.40 mA in the lower division. There was no statistically significant difference in the results between sides. The NET was falsely elevated by the use of electrode paste, presumably due to current shunting away from the nerve.
    Based on the technique described herein, an absolute NET of > 1.25 mA in the upper division or an absolute Net > 2.0 mA in the lower division of the human facial nerve is statistically abnormal. These norms are not applicable to grossly obese patients or patients with facial edema or inflammation. Statistical norms allow the NET results to be reported on a continuous scale rather than the dichotomous scale used in the past. The predictive power of the NET will be greatly enhanced by basing test interpretation on both statistical and clinical significance.

Who's Afraid of the Facial Nerve
Kedar K. Adour, MD
Excerpted from Otology (Chapter 21), S.E. Lucente, ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995. Send reprint requests to Kedar K. Adour, MD, Dept. of Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 280 W. MacArthur Blvd., Oakland, CA 94611-5693.
ABSTRACT: Facial paralysis is frightening to the patient and to the physician. This fear often leads to unnecessary, expensive tests and, at times, to inappropriate treatment. A systematic guide for evaluating patients with facial paralysis is offered which includes completion of a medical history and physical examination and selection of laboratory, x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prognostic electrical testing. Nuances of differential diagnosis and use and interpretation of electroneurography and maximal stimulation testing (MST) are discussed. A newly revised method of recording and predicting prognosis using the Hilger H3 Nerve Stimulator and MST is given. Guidelines for frequency of follow-up visits, need for consultation, and treatment are offered. The objective of this text is to instill confidence in the treating physician, which in turn will reassure the patient and reduce the cost of evaluation without sacrificing sound medical judgment. Medico-legal implications will be considered, and case studies will illustrate the course.

Value of Nerve-Excitability Measurements in Prognosis of Facial Palsy
E.D.R. Campbell, D.Phys.Med.; R.P. Hickey, D.Phys.Med.; K.H. Nixon, D.Phys.Med.; A.T. Richardson, D.Phys.Med.
British Medical Journal 2: July 7, 1962, 7-10.
ABSTRACT: A simple test of motor-nerve excitability is described. This test distinguishes between physiological block and degeneration of the facial nerve as early as 72 hours after the onset of facial palsy. The results of this test and their relation to the time and degree of recovery in facial nerve palsies of various types are described. It is suggested that such a test should be used in the assessment of treatments of facial palsy.


SILVERSTEIN ARTICLES

Adaptor for Continuous Stimulation (SACS) with the WR-S8 Monitor/Stimulator
Herbert Silverstein, MD
Paper presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology, September, 1989. Send reprint requests to Herbert Silverstein, MD, Ear Research Foundation, 1921 Floyd St., Sarasota, FL 34239.
ABSTRACT: Routine intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function has been used since 1985. An adaptor has been developed for continuous stimulation (SACS) to be used with the new WR-S8 Monitor/Stimulator. The SACS allows the microsurgical instruments and air drills to be electrified and to function as probe-tips during surgical dissection. The new WR-S8 Monitor/Stimulator has an ultra-sensitive strain-gauge which detects facial movement before it is palpable. The remote probe allows an assistant to adjust the current easily. The routine use of facial nerve monitoring with SACS has decreased surgical time, has helped prevent iatrogenic injuries, and has improved our ability to save the facial nerve during otological and neurotological surgery.

Facial Nerve Monitoring Among Graduates of the Ear Research Foundation
Michael J. Olds, P. Todd Rowan, Jon E. Isaacson, and Herbert Silverstein
The American Journal of Otology 18: 1997, 507-511. Send reprint requests to Herbert Silverstein, MD, Ear Research Foundation, 1921 Floyd St., Sarasota, FL 34239.
ABSTRACT: Routine facial nerve monitoring is not considered the standard of care in most communities; however risk of facial nerve injury appears to be greatly reduced when this adjunctive technique is emplyed.

Innovative Techniques: Facial Nerve Monitoring and Stimulation During Surgery for Chronic Ear Disease
Eric E. Smouha, MD
Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 3/1: March, 1992, 43-37. Send reprint requests to Eric E. Smouha, MD, Asst. Prof. of Surgery, Health Sciences Center T19, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8191.
ABSTRACT: Preservation of facial nerve function is a major concern during surgery for chronic ear disease. Facial nerve monitors have already gained broad acceptance in neurotologic and skull base surgery. There has been a growing consensus, even among the most experienced otologists, that facial nerve monitoring has value in middle ear and mastoid surgery as well. It is likely that use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring will become more widespread in the future.
    A competent otologist must have a thorough knowledge of the anatomic relations of the facial nerve and must be technically skilled at dissecting around the nerve. Facial nerve monitoring cannot replace basic anatomic knowledge nor can it replace surgical skill. It may, nonetheless, benefit the surgeon in certain instances. The surgeon can use facial nerve monitoring and stimulation as an aid to accomplish the following:
        Estimate the location of the facial nerve within bone, diseased soft tissue, or altered anatomy.
        Provide continuous feedback when dissecting tissue from an exposed facial nerve.
        Predict the presence or absence of bony covering when a portion of the nerve is concealed by soft tissue.
        Specify the site and magnitude of conduction block in cases of facial nerve paralysis.
        Provide warning of imminent injury to the nerve.
        Predict functional integrity at the end of surgery.
    During supervision of resident cases, a monitoring device may provide a margin of security to the attending surgeon whose hands are not directly in the operative field. When used by experienced surgeons, facial nerve monitoring and stimulation may offer intangible advantages that allow surgery to proceed more rapidly and with a greater sense of confidence.

Intraoperative Monitoring, Part A: Facial Nerve
Herbert Silverstein, MD, and Seth Rosenberg, MD, eds.
Excerpted from Surgical Techniques of the Temporal Bone and Skull Base, Chapter 3, Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1992.
ABSTRACT: Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring has been shown to reduce the probability of iatrogenic injury to the facial nerve during surgery, to save surgical time, and to reduce both patient and surgeon anxiety. However, it does not replace good surgical judgment or thorough knowledge of facial nerve anatomy. The author lists five goals of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: 1) early identification of the facial nerve through stimulation, 2) alerting the surgeon of facial stimulation, 3) mapping the course of the facial nerve, 4) reducing trauma to the facial nerve, and 5) evaluation and prognosis of facial nerve function.
    The types of monitors include muscle movement detection devices, such as the Silverstein Model S8, which uses a solid-state cheek sensor. Mechanical muscle contractions cause the pressure in the sensor to change, which sounds an alarm. False muscle movement artifacts are electrically filtered. A supplement to the monitor, the Silverstein Adaptor for Continuous Stimulation (SACS), allows the surgeon to electrify microinstruments or air drills. The use of electrified microinstruments and drills allows rapid identification of the facial nerve and helps the surgeon find the facial nerve obscured by disease or tumor. A second type of monitor detects electrical activity in muscles. Electromyographic recording devices use electrodes placed in facial muscles to detect nerve activity due to physiologic activity, manipulation, trauma, or electrical stimulation. The activity is presented to the surgeon in both audio and visual forms.
    Both mechanical pressure and EMG monitoring of the facial muscles give the surgeon valuable information about the status of the facial nerve. Each system has advantages and disadvantages, and may be used simultaneously to provide safe monitoring of the facial nerve.

Medical-Legal Aspects of Temporal Bone Surgery
Herbert Silverstein, MD, and Seth Rosenberg, MD, eds.
Excerpted from Surgical Techniques of the Temporal Bone and Skull Base, Chapter 1, Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1992.
ABSTRACT: Over the last two decades, knowledge of the medical-legal aspects of medicine has become as important as knowledge of the disease processes and surgical techniques. Fortunately, in recent years the number of malpractice suits against temporal bone surgeons has decreased. This has been due in part to advances in surgical techniques, such as intraoperative monitoring, and in part to greater awareness and understanding by otologists of the medical-legal issues of medicine. A "bad result" is sometimes inevitable; however, through meticulous risk management, some malpractice suits can be avoided.

Operating Room and Patient Setup
Herbert Silverstein, MD, and Seth Rosenberg, MD, eds.
Excerpted from Surgical Techniques of the Temporal Bone and Skull Base, Chapter 2, Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1992.
ABSTRACT: One of the most important things for the neuro-otologic surgeon to achieve is a well-equipped operating room with specialized personnel dedicated to otology and neuro-otology. A personal scrub assistant who takes care of the instruments and assists with surgery will make surgical procedures proceed smoothly and efficiently and reduce surgical time. The setup for otologic and neuro-otologic cases is both time consuming and detailed. It is best to have one's own surgical equipment that is not used by other surgeons, so that missing or broken equipment is not discovered during surgery. Once the personnel are trained and the equipment is obtained, one must establish a routine that is followed for each case.

Routine Identification of the Facial Nerve Using Electrical Stimulation During Otological and Neurotological Surgery
Herbert Silverstein, MD; Eric Smouha, MD; and Raleigh Jones, MD
Laryngoscope 98/7: July, 1988, 726-30. Send reprint requests to Herbert Silverstein, MD, Ear Research Foundation, 1921 Floyd St., Sarasota, FL 34239.
ABSTRACT: We routinely identify the facial nerve to avoid facial nerve injury during most otologic surgery. Since 1985, we have used a facial nerve stimulator/monitor as an added safety feature in 383 consecutive otologic and neurotologic cases. In our last 30 middle-ear, 8 retrolabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy, and 14 acoustic neuroma cases we used the monopolar stimulator probe-tip to determine threshold currents needed to produce facial twitch. Stimulation thresholds varied according to the amount of soft tissue or bone overlying the facial nerve. The stimulator was useful for predicting dehiscences in the bony facial canal during middle-ear and mastoid surgery. The exposed facial nerve usually stimulated at a level less than 0.1 mA (mean 0.05 mA), and the horizontal facial nerve covered by bone stimulated at 0.25 mA or greater (mean 0.6 mA). The stimulator was also used to predict the amount of bone overlying the vertical facial nerve at the annulus. An approximate relationship of 1.0 mA of threshold current to 1.0 mm of bony covering was found. After acoustic neuroma surgery, the stimulation threshold of the facial nerve at the brain stem helped predict postoperative facial function. Cases with current thresholds of 0.3 mA or less resulted in normal facial function. During ear surgery, routine identification of the facial nerve with the aid of a facial nerve stimulator will help avoid facial nerve injury.

Routine Intraoperative Facial Nerve Monitoring During Otologic Surgery
Herbert Silverstein, MD; Eric E. Smouha, MD; and Raleigh Jones, MD
The American Journal of Otology 9/4: July, 1988, 269-75. Send reprint requests to Herbert Silverstein, MD, Ear Research Foundation, 1921 Floyd St., Sarasota, FL 34239.
ABSTRACT: We have used intraoperative monitoring and stimulation of facial nerve function routinely in 301 consecutive otologic and neurotologic cases. The device has been safe, simple to use, and practical. Facial contraction is detected by a strain-gauge sensor in the corner of the mouth and is signaled audibly to the surgeon. Electrical stimulation of the facial nerve can be delivered through a sterile probe, which produces a constant-current-square-wave impulse. The device has several advantages: it signals unintentional mechanical stimulation of the facial nerve during surgery; it allows mapping of the nerve through soft tissue, tumor, and bone; it predicts dehiscences in the bony covering of the nerve; and it allows confirmation of the electrical integrity of the nerve before and after surgery. In this paper we present a technical description of the device, relevant intraoperative electrical measurements, and illustrative case examples. Although the device does not replace anatomic knowledge and surgical ability, it provides a margin of security during ear surgery. This system for intraoperative facial monitoring is practical, and the authors encourage its routine use.


BRACKMANN II ARTICLES

Improved Preservation of Facial Nerve Function in the Infratemporal Approach to the Skull Base
John P. Leonetti, MD; Derald E. Brackmann, MD; and Richard L. Prass, MD, PhD
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 101/1: July, 1989, 74-78. Send reprint requests to John P. Leonetti, MD, Division of Otology, Neurotology, and Skull Base Surgery, Dept. of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153.
ABSTRACT: Although the infratemporal approach described by Fisch provides excellent exposure of the jugular foramen, intrapetrous carotid artery, and lateral skull base, the anterior displacement of the seventh cranial nerve often results in temporary facial paralysis. The use of a modified technique for facial nerve mobilization resulted in significant improvement of both early and final facial function. Since that earlier report, continuous intraoperative electrical facial nerve monitoring has been used during the infratemporal approach in 20 additional cases. Immediate postoperative facial function was normal in 93 percent of the monitored cases and in 70 percent of the cases in the unmonitored group. More important, no patients in the monitored group developed grade V or VI weakness after surgery, whereas 48 percent of the unmonitored patients had grade V or VI weakness during the early postoperative period. This article will describe how intraoperative facial nerve monitoring is used during infratemporal surgery and will compare early facial function in 31 unmonitored patients with early facial function in 20 monitored procedures.

Practical Aspects of EMG Facial Nerve Monitoring: Insights and Pitfalls
Allen J. Senne, MA
Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, September, 1992.
ABSTRACT: Continuous intraoperative EMG facial nerve monitoring (EMGFNM) has become a well established practice that assists the surgeon in preserving the functional integrity of the facial nerve. It has been successfully employed during neurologic, as well as selective otologic procedures. The proper use of EMGFNM has resulted in a significant reduction in both the incidence and degree of post-operative facial nerve weakness.
    During the past several years, the practice of EMGFNM has evolved from the rudimentary auditory amplification of the alterations of electrical potentials recorded at musculature innervated by the facial nerve, to a refined combination of oscilloscopic and acoustic representations of EMG activity. These dramatic improvements in instrumentation, and the concurrent evolution of a fairly standard monitoring protocol, have generated a demand for a more concise interpretation of these alterations of intraoperative EMG activity levels. These fluctuations in EMG activity levels have been grossly referred to in the literature as "bursts" or "trains" of activity, although the relative significance of either type of activity is still a matter of speculation. In addition, several authors' studies have also proposed a correlation between the degree and type of activity seen during surgery and the post-operative facial result. It appears, then, that given the lack of standard interpretive criteria available, there is a wide chasm between the stimulus that appears and is heard on the monitor during a procedure, and understanding the true significance of that stimulation. The result of this dilemma is an uncertain response from the surgical team to what is perceived on the monitor. Since significant surgical decisions often depend on the interpretation of the monitored signal, a clear understanding of the factors that can adversely affect the reliability of the EMG signal is essential. This paper addresses three problems commonly encountered while monitoring the facial nerve during surgery, and then offers some practical suggestions for the interpretation of the EMG response.


  RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE RETURN TO WR MEDICAL HOME  


 
 


WR Medical Electronics Co. 123 North Second Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 USA.
Phone 651-430-1200. Fax 651-439-9733. General email: email

All content copyright 1998-2004 by WR Medical Electronics Co. All rights reserved. For trademark and patent information,
please go to our legal notices page.
Last modified 24-Nov-2004